“I think you’re starting to see a growing consensus,” said Matt Savare, a partner who works in the technology group of New Jersey-based law firm of Lowenstein Sandler LLP. “I do quite a bit of FinTech and I can tell you my clients… the banks, are inherently conservative – at least the large ones. But once they see other banks adopt new technologies, you see it snowball. Other banks will often join on in pretty quick fashion.” On the heels of JPMorgan Chase & Co. creating its own stable coin token for use on blockchain distributed ledgers, IBM last week launched its Blockchain World Wire, which will enable banks to transfer tokens and cryptocurrency in near-real time, cutting out banking intermediaries and lowering capital costs and clearing fees.
IBM will run the blockchain infrastructure – the computer nodes and software – and the banks will transmit digital tokens tied to fiat currency over the network. One of the Philippines largest banks– Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation (RCBC), will be among the first of four using the Blockchain World Wire for remittance payments services. Those payments are mainly made by foreign workers who send money back to their home country in the same way Western Union and MoneyGram do today. These kinds of moves are likely to spark even more experimentation and use in the financial world.
Avivah Litan, a Gartner vice president of research, said various vertical industries – including financial services – are now beginning to “actualize” the benefits of blockchain technology, which is constructed on a peer-to-peer network topology where every participant receives their own copy of an electronic transaction ledger. Litan compared blockchain-based payment, clearing and settlement networks to 5G for the communications marketplace, saying the old financial systems are long past due for an upgrade. “We had really slow communications networks and we’re always upgrading those because of demand for video and entertainment. We never pay attention to the payment networks and we need to,” Litan said.
Banks are showing interest
An IBM spokesperson confirmed that the company has had discussions with two major U.S. banks considering issuing a stable coin for use on the World Wire network. That would echo what JPMorgan did earlier this year when it launched its own fiat-backed token for its payment network. “Because IBM World Wire runs on blockchain, it has a low fee structure and low operational costs. The total transaction cost is comprised of two components – a per-transaction fee and a basis point charge applied to the total payment value,” an IBM spokesperson said. “In total, the overall cost is still far less than what is being charged in the market today.” IBM expects to see from 10 percent and 20 percent savings in operational liquidity management and potentially more than a 50 percent reduction in overall transaction cost, according to Stanley Yong, CTO of IBM Blockchain for Finance.
“Stable coin is a unique breed,” Savare said. “There are a variety of online retailers accepting not only stable coin, but cryptocurrency like bitcoin and ether. I think you’re going to see a growing trend, especially among millennials who tend to use crypto, especially at the retail level. You’re already seeing that and it’s not just tech geek types.” Along with JPMorgan, IBM and its banking partners, Visa, Mastercard and New York-based global settlement service CLS bank have also deployed blockchain-based payment networks. CLS handles about $5 trillion a day in global settlements.
Once banks are comfortable using blockchain-based foreign exchange (FX) networks such as IBM’s World Wire, and believe it’s efficient, reliable and secure, they will likely open up those payment services to business and consumer customers, Litan said. Blockchain DLT offers several advantages over conventional payment and settlement networks. Along with reducing friction and fees from central banks that oversee the transactions, the distributed ledgers are transparent to participants; everyone gets a real-time copy of the immutable ledger. And those ledgers can be used for audits.
“One of the problems in the current payment systems is they’re so opaque. When you move money, you can’t see when it’s going to get there. Some systems will tell you it’ll be there in two days, but you don’t have a lot of visibility,” Litan said. “This [World Wire] is totally visible to the participants. It’s actually a great technology for moving money.” Along with financial services companies, companies such as Facebook are purportedly working on creating blockchain-based payment systems that would allow users to have a “PayPal-like” experience to purchase advertised products. The new cadre of blockchain-based payment networks are bound to compete with traditional networks, such as VisaNet and SWIFT, as well as with earlier blockchain-based FX and settlement networks such as Ripple.
SWIFT, which stands for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, is behind most cross-border money and security transfers, serving 10,000 member institutions who send about 24 million messages daily over the network. In what may be an attempt to thwart an end run around it, SWIFT said earlier this month it will jointly conduct a blockchain proof-of-concept in the Asia Pacific region with securities software provider SLIB and the Singapore Exchange (SGX), along with Deutsche Bank, DBS Bank, HSBC Holdings and Standard Chartered Bank.
The hurdles that lie ahead
Ethan Silver, a partner at Lowenstein Sandler LLP who leads the firm’s regulatory practice relating to blockchain technology and digital assets, said existing regulations will have to be interpreted appropriately to address DLT payment networks, but they probably won’t “perfectly” address the technology in their current state. “We have already seen the SEC… commenting on stable coins for example, and how some of them have the appearance of securities,” Silver said via email. “Accordingly, companies have to be very mindful of the existing structure of the legal landscape and its application to evolving technology like blockchain in this paradigm shift, including for currencies.”
Along with the future of international regulatory oversight, blockchain networks have to prove they can scaleup enough in performance to match traditional networks such as VisaNet. “It’s got to be proven to operate 10,000 transactions per second,” Litan said. “We’ve seen it in pilots, but we haven’t seen it in production yet. That’s the main hurdle: scalability. Then there’s security and data confidentiality – all the usual things have to be proven.” The Distributed Technology Research (DTR) Foundation, the Swiss organization behind the new Unit-e cryptocurrency development effort backed by seven universities, is targeting throughputs of 5,000 to 10,000 transactions per second.
Along with addressing performance issues, however, banks can’t simply rely on blockchain service providers such as IBM, Google, Microsoft and SAP to run the infrastructure – the so-called rails over which payment transfers ride; in a sense, the financial services industry must “take ownership” of blockchain technology by committing internal resources to it.”For instance, IBM is not in a position to become a bank issuing stable coin. IBM doesn’t collect deposits from consumers or companies, so they don’t have deposits being used for stable coin. You have to have collateral,” Litan said. “They can have IBM manage it on their behalf, but they really have to own it, meaning they need to know how it works, they need to be able to run it if they have to, they have to be able to manage their demands.
Banks must also commit back-office IT staff to oversee transaction networks because they do not run on their own and must be managed for risk, something already done with legacy payment and settlement networks. “So I don’t think there will be much more to managing this,” Litan said. Lastly, few banks today are participating in blockchain transaction validation – the consensus process where large numbers of participants endorse transactions versus a central authority. The larger the crowd endorsing the transactions, the greater the security because it will be nearly impossible for one or even many bad actors to usurp the consensus mechanism and take control of a network.
IBM chose to use Stellar stable coin and cryptocurrency, which is known for the ease with which it can be used for international settlements. Stellar is considered robust for its ability to process many transactions in parallel. “I think that’s one reason IBM chose Stellar. Some of our blockchain clients are migrating toward Stellar. Four years ago, they’d say Ether and now it could be Ether, Stellar, or any one of a number of cryptocurrencies,” Savare said. “I think it’s going to democratize banking.”
The article first appeared on Computerworld